ter Meulen (eds.), The Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, pp. Reiss (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Oxford University Press.īeaver, D.: 1997: Presupposition. and Zeevat, H.: to appear, Accommodation. ![]() Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 2. and Krahmer, E.: 2001, A Partial Account of Presupposition Projection. Other papers in the trivalent traditionīeaver, D.Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16, 3: 325-256 (32 pages) Schlenker, P.: 2007, Anti-Dynamics: Presupposition Projection Without Dynamic Semantics. Formal Properties of the Transparency Theory.Van der Sandt, R.: 1992, Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution. The DRT Alternative to Dynamic Semantics.15320052, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 52-73Ībrusan, Marta (2010) "Triggering Verbal Presuppositions" Manuscript, Oxford. Ueyama(ed.), Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Reference and Anaphora: Toward the establishment of generative grammar as an empirical science, Report of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Project No. Percus, Orin (2006) "Antipresuppositions". Singh, Raj (2010) "Maximize Presupposition! and Local Contexts" Accepted with minor revisions in Natural Language Semantics. Symmetric Accounts of Presupposition Projection: An Experimental Approach". Ĭhemla, Emmanuel and Schlenker, Philippe (2012). "Processing presuppositions: dynamic semantics vs pragmatic enrichment". "Presuppositions of quantified sentences: experimental data". Peters, S.: 1979, A Truth-Conditional Formulation of Karttunen's Account of Presupposition. (2008) ‘Predicting Presupposition Projection: some alternatives in the strong Kleene tradition’, manuscript, UCLA. (2008) 'Presupposition Repairs: a Static, Trivalent Approach to Predicting Projection’, M.A. Language and Linguistics Compass 5, 12: 858–879 DOI: 10.1111/j.įox, Danny (2008) Two short notes on Schlenker’s theory of presupposition projection. Schlenker, Philippe: 2011, “Presupposition Projection: Two Theories of Local Contexts – Part II”. Schlenker, Philippe: 2011, “Presupposition Projection: Two Theories of Local Contexts – Part I”. Mind 2010 (short and relatively non-technical) Schlenker, P.: 2010, "Presuppositions and Local Contexts". Semantics and Pragmatics 2, 3: 1–78, 2009 Schlenker, P.: 2008, " Be Articulate: A Pragmatic Theory of Presupposition Projection". Available here through Semantics Archive. van der Sandt (ed.) "Presupposition, Lexical Meaning and Discourse Processes: Workshop Reader," University of Nijmegen, 1990. Heim, I.: 1990, Presupposition Projection. Geurts, B.: 1999, Presupposition and Pronouns. Reprinted in Davis (ed): 1991, Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford University Press. Karttunen, L.: 1974, Presupposition and Linguistic Context. (ed): 1991, Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford University Press. Stalnaker, R.: 1974, Pragmatic Presuppositions. (ed): 1991, Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford University Press (eds), Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 114-125. Heim, I.: 1983, On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions. Sessions (still tentative to be adapted as we go) Slides, Problem Sets and Readings: they are available in this Dropbox folder. We will provide an introduction to this debate, first by developing an explicit 'dynamic semantics' for presuppositions, and then by developing a pragmatic alternative to it, the 'Transparency Theory'. In recent years, pragmatic alternatives within classical semantics were developed. Global Distinguished Professor, New York UniversityĮuryi Project Leader, ESF Advanced Grant Leader, ERCĮ-mail: Assistant: Jeremy Kuhn, Institut Jean-NicodĮ-mail: the 1980's, the analysis of 'presupposition projection' led to the development of a new and more powerful type of semantics, called 'dynamic semantics'. ( LINGUAE, Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS New York University)Ĭogmaster, December 2015-January 2016 (LC2)ĭirecteur de Recherche, Institut Jean-Nicod, Paris
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |